Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: koan who wrote (7448)	4/24/2009 1:51:38 PM
From: Hawkmoon	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 86356

Y'know.. from my perspective, it's not personal and not so much about your son. The entire scientific global warming community is on the take if they are receiving $$$$ to research a biased conclusion (which is what calling it "global warming" is.. BIAS).. "Climate change research center" would MUCH MORE APPROPRIATE and should also include potential global cooling as well. If they specialize in "global warming" then it will prejudice their research to that particular bias, neglecting other climatic influences that should be factored in. You can't very well issue a paper on the potential impact of minimal sunspot activity to create global cooling if your entire research center's focus is on global warming. That's my beef.. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next