SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (7515)4/24/2009 7:40:44 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) of 86356
 
There is a thing called the scientific method which is specifically constructed to counteract any true believers.

Christy Todd Whitman when she was the EPA person under bush issued a report talking about the possiblility of global warming which Bush made her retract and she later quit.

Then Bush's head guy for GW was caught rewriting scientific reports about global warming and he quit the next day. He was softening the scientists conclusions.

The scientific community has just been outragesd at how the bush administration impeded and distorted their research.

But if you are just going to dismiss the worlds scientists as a bunch of kooks bought and paid for, and the oil and coal industry scientists as the only ones with expertise and truthfulness, then there is nothing I say that would convince you of anything.

Bottom line though is that if there is a good chance we are causing severe global warming surely you would agree it needs to be investigated.

Wouldn't that make sense to you?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News