SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: koan who wrote (7521)4/24/2009 11:41:10 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 86356
 
Then Bush's head guy for GW was caught rewriting scientific reports about global warming and he quit the next day. He was softening the scientists conclusions.

That's the ENTIRE POINT.. those scientists were making CONCLUSIONS when it's pretty damn obvious that the jury is still out on global warming. Climatic change YES.. long-term global warming??? NO!! The President's chief scientist HAS THE RIGHT to require further evidence, especially in light of of the distorted and manipulated "hockey stick" reports.

With all climatic change, there are winners and losers. Maybe polar bears might suffer, but other fauna will flourish with warmer temperatures (and certainly flora as well). But if we have global cooling, the polar bears might STILL suffer or flourish, but other fauna and flora are going to suffer.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News