SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lorne who wrote (63695)4/26/2009 8:04:25 AM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) of 224727
 
I don't have a problem with that at all. Many times defense attorneys created a wall that did little but allow them to bill the client whenever they wanted to speak. It didn't work to the advantage of the client at all.

In such instances after the 1986 decision we would always give the miranda warning again and have them sign a form stating they wished to speak without their attorney present. The decision was far too restrictive as it removed the right of the suspect to exercise his right to speak without an attorney present.

I believe the proposal is good for all, suspect and police. It had given attorneys too much power and dragged cases on and on and made the system much more expensive and less effective.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News