Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: MrLucky who wrote (303103)	4/29/2009 12:28:04 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (2) of 793958

Haven't had a chance to read this yet, but here's a new USSC decision regarding indecency on public airwarves: Under the Administrative Procedure Act, Federal Communications Commission orders stating that expletive use of certain words may be actionable and its finding that two broadcasts were actionably indecent were not arbitrary and capricious. Agency policy that a lack of repetition weighs against a finding of indecency but is not a safe harbor also did not violate the act. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. - filed April 28, 2009 Cite as 07-582 Full text metnews.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next