SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (476287)4/29/2009 10:22:12 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1574476
 
That law was considered by representative stake holders in the decision about what should be allowed in those interrogations. The procedure was legal, appropriate, thorough and according to due process. Not everyone agrees they made the right decision but the decision was made and it was made legally.

What are you trying to say? Who are the rep. stake holders? What was the procedure? Who made what decision?

It would not, however, negate the legal entitlement of the Bush Administration to have engaged in operations that had been fully approved by the justice department and by congress.

I don't care if God came down and said it was legal. If it violates the rule of law; the treaties and conventions to which the US is a signatory, then its not legal.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News