"Actually there was no 186 times, as I predicted it would turn out when these figures were released. But had he answered the questions on the first time, it would have been over. Right?"
No 186 times? What was it then 166 times?? Those are numbers that came out of Bushie documents... Had he answered the Q's the first time?? What makes you think he didn't?? You are saying if he answered as it was desired, ie what his interrogators wanted to hear (a connection to AQ and to 9-11)they wouldn't have tortured him anymore.... Would you believe an answer after 186 torture procedures???? No effing way....
An Army mouthpiece (retire Colonel or General) who interviews on Imus regularly says that the most effective questioners were women who got prisoners to open up by offers of, eg, Twix bars and Martha Stewart magazines (the latest issue)....
"Inflicting pain and/agony
mentally or physically,
to coerce or punish....
Okay, I'm with you. Now, we're getting somewhere."
186 waterboardings,hanging for days by the hands, sleep deprivation, freezing, loud music, nudity, you would not consider torture? And don't even try to give me the phony Bush legal excuse... Answer with your conscience or don't try. |
