Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (477912)	5/5/2009 1:26:02 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 1576521

I suggest you familiarize yourself with what a question mark (?) means. There are more innocents tortured than guilty... A false statement. We used enhanced interrogation on three persons back during 2002 and 2003. I say they're guilty in fact, regardless of the status of their trials. Which ones were innocents if you think most were innocent? And let me point out that in claiming the AQ members subject to enhanced interrogations were innocent, you are in fact arguing their case. You can't have it both ways: 'Don't say I'm arguing for AQ' but 'oh btw they're innocent.' How can you get angry over a suggestion you're arguing for the enemy when in fact, you are claiming they're innocent? Saying that amounts to just the kind of argument you get angry about when its pointed out. -------------------------------------- Except for the stabbing what torture did JC receive that exceeded what some of our prisoners received. He was tortured to death. Scourged, nailed to a cross, stabbed in the side with a spear. scottrichardslive.com thetalentshow.org ----------------------------------------- "Roughed up a little".... Compared to Jesus crucifixion, yes. What we did to three AQ members we do to lots of our own troops in SERE training. --------------------------------------- lol Do we or should we torture mass murderers??? No. But there's no issue there of dangers from future terror attacks. To prevent another 911 attack, when such an attack has been promised, is an unusual situation that wouldn't apply to a mass murderer.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next