SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: LindyBill5/5/2009 8:23:59 PM
2 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) of 793759
 
Wow. Talk about "flying monkeys!"

Extremely Disturbing

By David Foster on Uncategorized

Obama has nominated Cass Sunstein, who he knows from the University of Chicago, to be "regulatory czar." Apparently, Sunstein has proposed that web sites be required to link to opposing opinions. He has argued that the Internet is anti-democratic because users can choose to view only those opinions that they want to see, and has gone so far as to say:

>>>A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government," he wrote. "Democratic efforts to reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom's name.<<<

The forced-linking proposal makes about as much sense as requiring that when you buy a political book at a bookstore, the store must also require you to buy books of contrary views. (And anyhow, how to you force the person to read the book or follow the link? Will there be a test? Penalties for failing to pass? Withdrawal of book-buying or web-browsing "privileges?") Sunstein's proposal is almost certainly unconstitutional–moreover, it is philosophically primitive. There are not one or two dissenting views from any opinion: there are thousands of them, incorporating widely differing conceptual frameworks. Who, in Sunstein's world, would decide which views, as expressed by which authors, would be required to be linked? Probably either a government agency or a "service" run by a politically-well-connected corporation. A better way to suppress innovative thought could would be difficult to imagine.

Sunstein has apparently now rethought his proposal, explaining that it would be "too difficult to regulate [the Internet] in a way that would respond to those concerns." He also admitted that the proposal would have serious constitutional issues. But the fact that he ever made such a proposal in the place raises serious questions about whether he should be in a position of governmental power.

The "regulatory czar" position for Sunstein was troublesome enough: I now see that he is being considered for the Supereme Court that is opening up as a result of David Souter's retirement.

Sunstein is clearly a smart guy, but as a generally-favorable BusinessWeek review of his book ("Going to Extremes") points out:

There's a whiff of elitism in Sunstein's apparent call for enlightened experts (like himself) to gently correct the cockeyed masses.

I'd say it's more than a whiff.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext