SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (118418)5/7/2009 9:40:57 AM
From: Freedom Fighter2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Thomas,

I obviously disagree.

The "surge" was about an entirely different strategy for dealing with the Iraqis that were aligning themselves with foreign fighters. The idea was to convince them to switch sides using a broad range of strategies.

In addition, while there may or may not have been a net increase in coalition troops (I didn't count), there was an increase in US troops to the problem areas where they were needed.

Personally, I think not acknowledging the success of the changed strategy because of politics (which is what you are doing) would be a horrible lesson for America to learn. The world may need this playbook elsewhere in the world again someday even if the US is not directly involved.

At the beginning of the surge I posted a 60 minute interview on the Charlie Rose with one of the foremost experts on the new strategy (one of the guys that wrote the playbook, but his name escapes me). He more or less laid out exactly what new things we were going to do, the risks, the upsides, the history of putting together the strategy, lessons learned elsewhere in the world in similar situations etc... If I ever stumble across it again, I'll post it.

You have to stop reading those left wing media sources. ;-)

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext