SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Bema(Bgo) and Arizona Star

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (8031)10/27/1997 5:58:00 PM
From: Ken Benes  Read Replies (2) of 10482
 
ole 49r:

Well it is confirmed. BGO is nothing more or less than a play on the price of gold. People laughed when I referred to BGO's effort with the CC becoming the Refuse to Go II. Instead of Amax, we have PDG to finance the development of the project. However, unlike the Refugio, BGO gets less than the 50% portion of the project that they get with Amax. In addition, PDG gets the blue sky potential of the Aldebaran property.
Markets do not lie, what has been evident to the markets, that Clive will retain control of the company at all cost, is now apparent to all. The only winner is Clive, he still has a company, I mean half a company, while we have to wait for a doomsday scenario to lift the price of gold. One question, why did BGO needed all those options to attract qualified people to develop the mine, when they knew in fact that PDG would pay for development, provide the expertise, and conduct further exploration. I think in the near future, a lot of those options will find their way into the corporate officers pockets rather than be used as they were intended to be.
What amazes me is that their will be members of this board who will pop the corks in celebration of BGO concluding a deal prior to 10/31.

Ken
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext