Hmmm, those are very interesting points.
Have you ever subscribed "Cadence"? I've been subscribing that
megazine for couple of years. As a frequent ADSK product user for
longer than a decade, it's quite hard to rationalize your view
as a resonable one.
Even though I do not expect farce puffery about ADSK products, people
should apply their prosaic experience and knowledge to justify
other people's product(I'd better say their hard work.) 88.06% of instituional holding is not a common record, isn't it? You don't think those 362 institutional investors are short of their brain, do you?
IMO, ADSK products are far better than others. Furthermore, by applying ARX, many 3rd party developers're presenting great products. I agree ADSK's transition endeavor causes some problem, but the direction is the right one. Even though I've been complaing about its cost, I agree the transition should be done to enhance its capability.
If anybody has a question about ADSK's products, then I think I have
enough knowledge and experience to answer those questions.
Any technical questions regarding ADSK or comparable products will
be welcomed.(I'm not sure I should do this, but I'll try anyway.)
IMHO, sharing our ideas and knowledge will be the main force to
strngthen the validity of this site.
Best Regards, |
