SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 231.80+1.7%Jan 16 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (260359)5/18/2009 6:18:02 PM
From: pgerassiRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
Tench:

One million free processors that are better than the competition at the time. Anyone who sees that would think there has to be a reason they didn't. Illegal acts would cover that. Can't be that engineering was off or they would not have taken any. To inferior is another for not taking any. But because they took some means that there was no technical reason not too. That they sold 160K given the illegal acts to restrain trade, means that without the illegal acts, they likely would have easily sold more than a million. HP did find out that they could make money with AMD and that they had positive margins.

Thus it was not technical reasons for refusing to take the full million, but illegal acts by Intel in restraint of trade and being an abusive monopoly.

That you don't like the facts over your fantasy is just too bad.

Pete
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext