Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)

AMD 221.52

+3.4%

2:02 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Windsock who wrote (260375)	5/19/2009 12:27:51 AM
From: fastpathguru	Read Replies (4) of 275872

Evidence: A report by a person who attended the hearing with Paul Ottelini and observed the proceeding. If you were not present at the hearing, you can ask one your fellow members on the AMD legal team who can confirm the report. Let's take your claim at face value. My response: So? Her leaving a meeting wouldn't necessarily mean ANYTHING. What was the meeting about? Was her presence required? Did she have more important things to attend to? Why doesn't Intel complain about this supposedly unfair treatment? You cannot damn her without more than simply stating "she skipped out on the meetings." All I see is innuendo (from outuendo) against Kroes... The Intel folk have no problem convicting HER without evidence that comes anywhere near Elmer's standards. And why would an AMD legal team necessarily be there? This case is between the EC and Intel. fpg

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next