SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The abortion issue: pro-choice vs. anti-abortion
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LLCF who wrote (203)5/19/2009 6:02:21 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 286
 
And 'straw man' is a nice phrase, but NO WHERE did I misrepresent you position.

You did indeed misrepresent my position. Apparently the straw man argument was based on misunderstanding not intentional deceit but it still happened.

You backed out of the idea that someone saying "I saw him do it" isn't evidence.

I haven't backed out of any idea.

Both my initial and my current position is that someone quoting someone else as saying they saw a snarl, isn't evidence of "throwing in with right wing hate groups".

And do it without posting ANYTHING of substance

The whole point here is that you provided no substance. You provide a claim about hate groups and throwing in with hate groups, and your evidence is that someone snarled. That's hardly something of substance. Its a strong accusation with nothing to back it up. It unsupported slander or calumny.

It leaves ME with nothing... the piece is quoting the president of a Catholic University... and says nothing about "one person"

The president of Catholic University is one person. As is the president of Trinity University (the person who was actually quoted, perhaps you didn't read the article).

Also Patricia McGuire (the president of Trinity) didn't say anything about hate groups, so you don't even have an argument from authority (with McGuire as the authority), you basically have nothing to support your assertion about hate groups. (It was your assertion, not McGuire's which is why I say it leaves YOU with nothing).

You have no evidence, no argument, no accusation from anyone but yourself, and not even a specific accusation in your own words. You name no hate groups, show no connection to any of them, and generally have nothing to support your claim.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News