SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: saveslivesbyday who wrote (203878)5/23/2009 12:50:19 PM
From: Skeeter BugRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
again, prop 13 isn't the problem.

state revenues have increased faster than population growth and inflation.

it isn't a revenue problem, it is a spending problem.

eliminating prop 13 does nothing to reduce the problem of out of control spending.

if prop 13 weren't in place, the unions would have fatter pensions, fatter medical and fatter benefits all the way around. the illegal aliens might have another $5 billion to blow on their illegal stay in the CA, too.

nobody wants this but the fascist state unions and one way open borders fans (don't even ask for equal access to mexico!).

CA is a strongly democratic state. the problem with prop 13 is that lots and lots and lots of democrats support it, too.

i'm incredibly thankful that it protected me, a reasonable home buyer, from the sheer idiocy of the goons running the federal reserve and the folks who fell into their debt trap.

you think it is fair that some folks would bid up homes well beyond their means to pay and the responsible home buyers should have their property tax tripled? oh, and then the irresponsible just walkk away - free and clear?

screw that.

*everyone* knew the rules when they purchased their home. nobody made them do it. if they didn't like the rules - DON'T BUY THE HOME.

now, is it reasonable that people can pass down their home through inheritance and retain the prop 13 limit? probably not. adjustments like that are reasonable, but not getting rid of it altogether (at least on primary residences).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News