Oh MY GOODNESS. How clueless can someone get? rrufff, take a look at this post.
"Did anybody else take note that Mr. Brick posted yesterday that people were LINED UP TO BUY at .045? Yes, he sure did. Yet nobody bought. If they were lined up to buy at .045 as claimed, where are all of the buys? I do not see them anywhere. Plenty of shares were available to buy between .02 and .045. So why didn't this long list of buyers that were lined up, not buy?"
ragingbull.quote.com
We have been arguing with someone who doesn't even know how to read L2!!!
That poster should not have made that post.
Now it's CRYSTAL CLEAR to see they don't even know the most basic elements of this market. He does not understand the BID and ASK, and who is selling, and who is buying!!!!!!!!!!
ROTFLMAO!
INCREDIBLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GB-ND
creede
My Oh MY that post has got to be put in the Pinhead Hall of Fame!
(oh, and here is a copy of the entire post to keep for prosperity! lmao)
By: itsonlyime12
28 May 2009, 01:16 PM EDT
Rating: Rate this post: Msg. 3549 of 3551
Jump to msg. #
My Oh My!
Yesterday I made a post saying that the .02 bid was looking good.
I was accused by Mr. Brick and now I see the MUTT on IHUB is also saying the same. That my post stating the bid of .02 was false and misleading.
How can something FACTUAL be false and misleading?
The BID was at .02 when I made my post. That is a fact!
Funny how these promotors claim that false and misleading POSITIVE information is factual when it is not, yet they claim that negative information that is factual is not factual.
Could it be those Pink Stripes that cause people to lose all sense of reality?
Are these promotors really going to deny that the bid did hit .02 yesterday, when it is a factual certainty that it did? Looks like they are.
Did anybody else take note that Mr. Brick posted yesterday that people were LINED UP TO BUY at .045? Yes, he sure did. Yet nobody bought. If they were lined up to buy at .045 as claimed, where are all of the buys? I do not see them anywhere. Plenty of shares were available to buy between .02 and .045. So why didn't this long list of buyers that were lined up, not buy?
Because it was another blatant lie by the Brick Master.
Take a look at the Article below discussing IHUB and Matt Browns involvement in 'PUMP AND DUMP PENNY SCAMS'.
The SEC is obviously taking action. It even insinuates that members of IHUB may have been SCAMMED by PUMP AND DUMP PENNY STOCK SCAMS, by the site, by Matt Brown and by MANY users of the site that PROMOTE PENNY STOCKS.
Now look at the facts. Mr. Brick, amongst many others, have a long running established history that goes back years. When looking at this factual history what does one see?
Oh my! They see Mr. Brick promoting many, and I do mean many, penny stocks. The promotions by Mr. Brick all contained false and misleading information and almost every single one of his 'can't miss scams', are now worthless and proven to be PUMP and DUMP scams.
Mr. Brick even has posted that he did sell shares of many companies while promoting others to buy.
The point in all of this is that Mr. Brick is a promotor of penny stocks on a site that is now being targeted by the SEC (I wonder how many individual or class action suits will be filed by members of IHUB?) for PUMP AND DUMP PENNY STOCK SCAMS.
Yet Mr. Brick thinks his actions are going unnoticed? He thinks he has nothing to fear?
With the SEC now targeting IHUB he is very naive if he does not think his actions are being brought to the attention of the SEC and even more naive if he thinks the SEC will ignore him, especially considering the number of years and the number of stocks he has promoted with false information, that are now worthless.
IMHO, the SEC is going to have a field day with IHUB and many posters of the site and I do feel strongly that Mr. Brick will no longer be posting excuse after excuse on message boards. More likely will be excuses from his Attorney to the SEC that will be laughable and inexcusable to the SEC.
I fully expect the SEC to take more actions against more people from IHUB.
Good luck Mr. Brick.
You are going to need it, imho. However, not even luck is going to get you out of this, imho.
I wonder why Mr. Brick has not already done some research and other type's of searches to see if his name is popping up anywhere and where is it popping up?
Boy, is he in for a serious shock and rude awakening!
Others already know this. But he doesn't?
HA HA!
==========================================
Felony Criminal Charges For InvestorsHub.com Operator, Matthew Brown, In Penny Stock Scheme
Posted May 21st 2009 3:55PM by George Tsiolis
InvestorsHub.com operater Matthew Brown and 7 other participants were charged by the SEC for their involvement in manipulative trading schemes often timed the to coincide with false or misleading press releases issued by companies to hype their stock. The four companies were GH3 International, Inc., Asia Global Holdings, Inc., Playstar Corp., and Xtreme Motorsports of California, Inc.
In addition, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware also announced felony criminal charges against 6 members of the group, including Matthew Brown.
WERE INVESTORSHUB.COM MEMBERS VICTIMS OF THESE SCHEMES?
Further details about participants and charges are outlined below - but the big question for AGORACOM is whether members of InvestorsHub.com were taken advantage of in these schemes? We know from the SEC's press release that:
"In the scheme involving Asia Global stock, the SEC alleges that Dynkowski
personally saw to it that the manipulative trading was coordinated with misleading
press releases from the company, and in some instances he wrote the press releases
for Asia Global himself. According to the SEC's complaint, Dynkowski instructed
Brown on Aug. 24, 2006, to have Asia Global issue a press release hyping the
company's second quarter 2006 financial results and to "make it sound ENORMOUS."
Given the fact Brown operates a very popular penny stock site that provides "free" stock alerts and also features sponsored penny stock press releases on its front page, it isn't a stretch to assume that his very own members may have been victims of these manipulative trading and press release schemes. We'll look deeper into the SEC complaint for any details.
PARTICIPANTS CHARGED BY THE SEC
The SEC's complaint, filed in federal district court in Delaware, charges seven others in addition to Brown:
* Pawel Dynkowski of Newark, Del.
* Jacob Canceli of Mission Viejo, Calif., who is a stock promoter.
* Gerard J. D'Amaro of Pompano Beach, Fla., who is a stock promoter.
* Joseph Mangiapane Jr. of Laguna Niguel, Calif, who was a registered representative at AIS Financial, Inc and is currently CEO of Rubicon Financial, Inc., which owned AIS Financial, Inc. during the relevant time period.
* Nathan M. Michaud of Boston, Mass., who is a web site designer.
* Marc J. Riviello of Redwood City, Calif., who was a registered representative at AIS Financial, Inc.
* Adam S. Rosengard of Voorhees, N.J., who was a student at the University of Delaware during the relevant time period.
PARTICIPANTS CHARGED BY THE U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware also today announced felony criminal charges against Dynkowski, Brown, Canceli, D'Amaro, Mangiapane, and Riviello. Michaud the web designer and Rosengard the student were not charged.
CONCLUSION
Once again, we thank the SEC for aggressively going after penny stock fraudsters. They are a scourge on an industry that is full of hard working and real small-cap companies that are trying to become tomorrow's leaders.
Unfortunately, the pump and dump schemes often overshadow the efforts of real small-cap companies and often serve to set the identity of the space amongst investors. The faster we get rid of them, the faster we can allow real small-cap companies to win or lose on their own merits, free of the baggage piled on by penny stock fraudsters.
Regards,
George
Tags: SEC, , small-cap stocks, small-cap, small cap, micro-cap stocks, micro-cap, micro cap, penny stocks, TSX Venture, CNQ, AMEX, OTCBB, Pink Sheets, AGORACOM, investor relations, online investors, online investor relations, IR, online IR, pump and dump, fraud, Matthew Brown, investors HUB, investorshub
PermalinkEmail thisComments [1]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1. I was permanently booted from a paid subscription at IHUB for asking pertinent questions as to why IHUB gave preferential treatment to the hundreds of paid promoters (mostly undisclosed) that committed fraud daily at IHUB.
The only solution to this problem is to get IHUB to close down. IMO this problem is not isolated to one person within the Company. Hopefully this will be the start of something once people start to beg for a deal.
Hopefully people will band together and insist on change. E-mail the advertisers and inform them of IHUB's situation. Hit them where it hurts.
They silenced me once but never again.
Posted at 10:41AM on May 23rd 2009 by PaulieWalnuts
Add your comments
|
