SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (6855)6/1/2009 7:44:14 PM
From: skinowski  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
Perhaps, Medicare could encourage savings if they share them with the beneficiaries. Let's say, the funding in a given community is $700 per person per month. Every month when they do not make charges to the system in excess of the funding, give them 5 or 10% of the balance as direct payment. That might work.

I've been watching for some years now with interest the "concierge" arrangements. Patients pay the doctors an annual retainer - anywhere from several hundred to several thousands dollars each year - for extra access and attention. In some cases Docs will accompany the patient on visits to specialists. Good for them! If they can afford it, why shouldn't they have it? Glad to see that so far the egalitarians have left these arrangements alone.

I like the idea of cheap clinics. Almost anything is cheap in comparison to a visit to an emergency room.

Hospitals are insanely expensive. This will remain so for as long as they will have to keep up with an avalanche of regulations and controls.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext