I've tried to read that board but, quite frankly, there are so many thousands of moronic rants, rumors, gossip and conclusions by those on high horses, that getting useful information is not that easy. After starting to read 1000's of posts, one gets quickly "short" circuited with posts that make no sense, lack any logic. Many are ganging up on those accused just because they cowardly like to kick someone when he or she is down.
Most of those who have expressed conclusions and who gossip are hypocrites who probably have as questionable background as those about whom they post. Make no mistake, I'm not defending the accusations. If true, they are terrible and will do damage to the reputation of the website. I just don't know enough about the issues to intelligently discuss them. Of course, lack of intelligence or knowledge does not prevent others from spamming that lack or showing hypocrisy.
For example, I know of one poster who was a paid shill for a stock, tried to stifle some discussion and when he wasn't paid, became a consistent basher. Not that this is criminal necessarily, but it shows that agenda is not so easy to criticize without being hypocritical.
With respect to the naked short issues, it does nothing of the kind. If you really spent the time reviewing the issues and my posts in particular, you would see that I often post that pinkies and tiny companies often use the NSS issues as an excuse to hide their own dilution and P&D activities. I don't know enough about the accusations about Matt and the others, but I've often commented about this in general.
The posts on my NSS, hedge fund, fails to deliver - board do not focus on pinkies in general. I'm sure there are some occasions where MM's and hedge funds have worked together in pennies, but, in general, I think we probably agree that the real issues on pinkies and sub-pennies involve dilution and dumping by management and insiders. I've written often about this. See, e.g., even on this board my comments about your long ANVH and SOFN picks.
So that this does not get miscontstrued and my posts are often the subject of lies, the issues of naked shorting, fails to deliver, manipulative posting by bashers, paid or unpaid, "associated" trades by manipulating shorts, are all valid and have been well-documented on my board and elsewhere. However, they should not be used to excuse pink sheet stock manipulation by management.
If you don't believe that these issues exist and remain very valid, perhaps more so today, start with the trial of Anthony, and then read about Jeff Thorpe, goldfinger and so many others. Remember, it should not be just a case of your citing, "my scam is ok, yours is not...."
Happy trading!! ROFLMAO.... |
