SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : BuSab
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Oral Roberts who wrote (693)6/8/2009 1:36:44 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (1) of 23934
 
The first part of the hoax is that there is any meaningful global warming. We are well within the normal climate cycles. But when you start measuring from the bottom of the cycle and compare that to the top of the cycle, the delta can look significant when in fact....it ain't no thing.

The second part of the hoax is that we have anything to do with it. Whether it is CO2 or something else. As far as the temperature diverging from the CO2 levels....there's a good reason for it. Warmer temperatures increase the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, cooler temperatures reduce the atmospheric CO2. And CO2 is a lagging indicator. In a few years we will see a drop in CO2 and the GWs will take credit for it when in fact we had nothing to do with it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News