SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brumar89 who wrote (10000)6/25/2009 8:40:36 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) of 86356
 
Interesting. So if this proposal makes it more costly to buy energy to produce our goods, which will make our goods more expensive on world markets, then this proposal attempts to counteract that by imposing an equalizing tariff on imports to ensure our businesses don't lose their competitiveness.

Not a bad idea, especially when you consider that most of our imports come from China, which has cheaper labor as well because they don't impose labor laws on their companies, like US companies do. On first blush, I like it. China is only competitive to us, because of the onerous laws our companies have to contend with to protect workers and make our products safe for consumption. China makes cheaper goods because their products are made with slave labor and can harm people. It's an equalizer.

But it will also create a trade war. Now that is a war we should be waging with China. We've let them take our markets for too long. Time to make sure their companies live up to the same standards our companies live up to, if they want to sell their goods here.

Just my first pass thoughts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext