Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (10022)	6/25/2009 9:17:51 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) of 86356

Hawk, I find the GW argument perhaps one of the most frustrating I have encountered in my life time. It is like a religion. Agreed.. But even more than that, it's the indifference to natural causes/influences that are staring them right in the face but they remain indifferent. It they REALLY CARED about GW, they would study how the earth's biosphere has handled CO2 and other GW gases via natural means over it's paleo-climatic history. Furthermore, it's far more effective to assist the natural biological sequestration systems than to think we can prevent Billions of people from demanding the same quality of life we possess. And they can't afford electric cars. Hawk

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next