Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (311738)	6/26/2009 12:28:28 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) of 793841

Lindy, Saddam, Uday and Qusay were attacked because of the supposed presence of WMDs. There were obviously none or few, so it seemed to me the real reasons were different. So it turned out to be. Saddam didn't have anything to do with the attacks on the Twin Towers. Now, we have an Islamic Jihadist Iranian president wanting to be armed with atomic bombs and it won't be long before he gets them with his centrifuges spinning flat out and his reactor nearing completion. He also has an avowed intention to destroy Israel, which means in plain English killing swarms of Jews. He also backs conflict with the USA. So, cut to the chase. Obama is pulling USA troops out of Iraq and moving to Afghanistan to finish dealing with Osama and Omar [all the O-men ama types together]. He could kill two birds with one stone by doing a road trip via Tehran, collecting Amendiejihad and the uranium concentrators on the way, taking him to Den Hague to give the International Criminal Court lawyers another line of profit, Milosevic having given up. Personally, I think I'd take water-boarding if given the choice of lawyers pecking my eyes, or water boarding. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next