Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (312983)	7/5/2009 5:21:33 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 793927

It probably would be a bit like Germany getting a nuclear bomb production line in 1933. Great Britain would have felt somewhat queasy at the prospect. France would have thought the Maginot line not such a great thing after all. Stalin would have paled. <A former head of research in Israeli intelligence told the Times that "the Saudis are very concerned about an Iranian nuclear bomb, even more than the Israelis." > Come to think of it, there is quite a daisy chain of nukes in the area = Russia, North Korea, China, India, Pakistan. Iran is next in the chain. It seems odd that Saudi Arabia would be more worried about Iranian nukes than Israel. There must be something I don't know about. I suppose it's the old Catholic vs Protestant thing. God can only be on one of their sides. It's a bit like Wimbledon. Once the Catholics and Protestants have sorted out who has Go- on their side, and the Sunnis and Shiites have had their semi-finals, then the centre-court grand finale at Armageddon can be fought. It should be best out of five. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next