SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WAVX: Wave Systems Corp.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: TREND17/7/2009 9:05:48 PM
   of 604
 
Posted by bbigtim
I don't really agree with the premise for your question. Since I first invested in Wave, the overall objective has been to provide software and services that would run on a trusted hardware platform. At first, Wave tried to create the hardware platform itself, but there was little interest in its proprietary platform. So the less elaborate "vanilla" TPM concept prevailed, and Wave adapted its software and services to run on that.

From my perspective, the principal moment at which Wave "reinvented" itself is when it abandoned the idea that OEMs could be persuaded to install its proprietary hardware platform, and committed to compatibility with all varieties of "vanilla" TPMs. But that was quite a few years ago. In any case, if Wave had not successfully positioned itself as the principal software provider for trusted hardware management, it would no longer exist.

I don't think that Wave is the "only company" in a position to manage trusted devices. There is competition for each one of the functions that Wave software provides, although there is not yet a competitive full-featured software suite. Wave is presently the dominant player in its market niche, but I don't believe any company can ultimately succeed in this niche without successfully marketing server side products.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext