SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Free Cash Flow as Value Criterion

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jbe who wrote (33)10/28/1997 8:04:00 PM
From: Pirah Naman  Read Replies (1) of 253
 
jbe:

I won't comment on the debt issues and the qualitative issues, since they aren't central to the issue here. I propose that for now at least we set aside any discussion of the relative merits of any of these companies.

What I am perceiving is that these different sources are calculating things differently. And I think this is where we would all benefit from investigating the differences further, in order to understand this. For example, going by the figures I pulled out of VL, and putting them in your terms, I get the following price to projected (1998)FCE ratios:

CSCO 32.65
CPQ 18.87
SUNW 13.66
ELY 17.84
DE 14.06
XRX 15.11
KO 34.04
CA 15.36
AMGN 15.11
TLAB 40.91
SGP 28.11

It seems to me that the discrepancies are so distinct across the board that we should try to figure them out.

BTW, in S&P Outlook's August "Buffett Screening" they got the following companies (among others); I include the price/1998 projected FCE ratio based on VL numbers for fun:

ADBE 17.31
AMGN 15.11
ELY 17.84
CSCO 32.65
DNEX 16.91
EMC 25.53
INTC 26.98
PMTC 23.14

Any ideas?

Pirah
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext