Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RetiredNow who wrote (11042)	7/10/2009 7:54:24 AM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) of 86355

Sigh. You also have to buy the land you put the windmills and solar farms and the transmission lines on. Trees and horses cost money to input. Sun and wind cost $0 to input. Are you kidding? How can you be so stupid? In all cases, you need to convert the "free" energy to a form you can use and get it to where you want to use it when you want to use it. And that is not free for anything. it's the input costs being free and the source being virtually limitless that is the criteria for renewable energy. And trees (and hay and oats) grow on free sunlight. Watered by free rain. What don't you understand? BTW I assure you, both Euro and American energy regs recognize wood as renewable. You are really something else. Just admit that you are wrong for once in your miserable life. I'm not wrong, you fool.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next