Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RetiredNow who wrote (11140)	7/11/2009 9:08:57 AM
From: enginer	Read Replies (2) of 86355

And keep in mind that NG is just CH4, methane, which can easily be made with heat, a catalyst, water, and coal. Opens up lots of opportunities for the thorium-based fuel cycle, or pebble bed reactor, USA coal, and NGL's etc. All we need to do is convince Chu that CO2 is not bad, and get him to admit it to Obama. The politics might be the hard part. By the way, I am NOT HAPPY with what I have heard about earthquakes set off by fracturing shale beds to get at SBM (shale bed methane.) This alone could put the kibosh on NG if all we go by is sound bytes.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next