SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (68662)7/16/2009 5:59:07 AM
From: MJ1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) of 224706
 
Good Morning Kenneth

I have removed you from my ignore list to address the claim you made in your message.

Au contraire to your claim and opinion----------

The burden of proof is with Mr. Barrack Hussein Obama, the Democrat Party as well as the party leaders such as David Axelrod.

When Mr. Obama filed to become a candidate on the Democrat Primary ticket under the laws of the Constitution and the United States of America the proof would have been a part of the filing.

This is required by our Constitution.

As you are aware, as the campaign progressed; Mr. Obama refused to show his original birth certificate, his passports and other pertinent documents, casting significant doubt upon his qualifications and candidacy.

What the people got was a post by the Daily Kos of a certificate which forensic experts have said was photoshopped.

As time progressed, Mr. Obama spent about 11 million dollars to avoid answering the questions that American citizens asked about documentation showing he had the legal right to run for President. First Americans asked politely and then via legal challenges.

Let's cut to the chase---------Mr. Obama had the burden of proof as a candidate for the POTUS to show to all voters that he is qualified by birth and citizenship. He failed to do so.

Instead, he evaded the polite inquiries and then evaded the legal inquiries.

Let's cut a little further to the chase--------by evading full disclosure he has undercut and challenged the foundations of America.

Mr. Obama states that he is a Constitutional Scholar/Lawyer; yet he has trampled on the very Constitution that he claims to know.

Mr. Obama may as well have burned the American flag and stomped on it.

Mr. Obama is not above our American laws, the Constitutional requirements apply to him as well as to all would-be candidates for President of the United States of America.

It's time for Mr. Obama to legally produce all of those documents.

If he can't do it then let the cookie crumble as it will.

jmho

mj
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News