International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lou Weed who wrote (23587)	10/29/1997 6:32:00 AM
From: Rock Doctor	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Mr. Mick O'Neill: I'm not going to argue with you - I'll give my reply, then you can have the last word ... 1) Sure, I posted a 'rumour' - I got it from a source who spoke directly to Doyle. I was honest about it all, and I passed this on to this thread, because that's what I think the thread is for. 2) Yes, I expressed an opinion - and I agree with you, we all have the right to do so, and you can take it or leave it (as we all do with Charters' opinions) 3) Now, if you want to compare me to Charters, then I WILL take offense. I don't post my opinion here 50 (FIFTY) times in one week. Nor do I have any other type of agenda (as Charters might have). Nor do I irrationally shout at the thread, "Good God people, buy this stock now before it's too late" I wonder if this is how people express opinions in the business that you work in. There is a proper way to express opinions and debate matters - I fully agree that such discussion is desirable and necessary, but surely you don't think Charters' approach is acceptable ... ...(do you?) Paul Nicholson

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next