Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (81476)	7/27/2009 12:46:03 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) of 82486

"one of the all time butt covering pieces of circular logic that I have ever seen" Not at all. It is clear and straightforward. It is homicide to kill a baby during birth This is a partial birth abortion and it is considered a homicide even though the fetus is not a human being. "it does nothing to bolster your claim that Partial BirthAbortions are ONLY done: "to save the life of the mother."" What I said (as you know) was "And it MOST CERTAINLY IS HOMICIDE TO KILL A CHILD DURING THE ACT OF BIRTH (otherwise sometimes called a partial birth abortion)--unless it is to save the life of the mother" By changing the nature of my quote you intended to deliberately misrepresent. You just dig yourself in deeper and deeper! The above paragraph ("And it MOST CERTAINLY IS HOMICIDE...") is my quote and it absolutely belies your lying accusation. You can twist and squirm all you want but it looks like you are forced to bite off your own foot--again! "So your statement ("The practical implications are that if you can kill a Human Being in the very act of being born, then why not change the Laws to allow the same type of killing Postpartum as people like Peter Singer advocate.") WAS an act of misrepresentation...as I said."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next