SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (7930)7/31/2009 8:44:14 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
He does the procedure because he was taught it in med school, the procedure has become the standard protocol for the ailment, and all his fellows do it. Either no one has studied outcome data or the fact that the procedure isn't effective or cost effective hasn't yet seeped into the set of protocols that doctors follow.

I have to think doctors are generally more up on the latest developments and findings in their field than someone who works for a government office would be.

Still, a government expression of the lack of utility of a particular procedure should give medical practitioners some cover in lawsuits even without tort reform. It could be seen as a back-door contributor to tort reform. Right now lawsuits are based on doctors failing to do something that is part of the accepted protocol. If the protocol changes because of what the government discovers about outcomes, then the doctor is in the clear.

John Edwards got filthy rich convincing juries that things within standard protocols wasn't good enough.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext