SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Sector Analysis (mostly)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: hubris33 who wrote (20)8/5/2009 4:33:49 PM
From: ItsAllCyclical  Read Replies (1) of 22
 
I wasn't much for conspiracies either until most of the stuff that went down over the last year. Most of the 911 stuff you can explain away. But building 7 is imho worth looking into further. Then compare to #3. You can bury you head in the sand and say it doesn't exist, but at this point I think there are decent odds. Not saying it's a sure thing, but it's more than 50% in my mind at this point.

I'd be happy to see a credible explanation for #7. Given the distance and the way it went down (without a plane strike) seems very, very unlikely imho. There are other issues as well, but hey I'm a nut, right?

We'll see what you think a few years from now.

I thought Sly was somewhat over the top when he started recently, but the more I dig the less I like. Have you at least read the Creature from Jekyll Island about the Fed?

All of this is BS of course as well

video.google.com

Again I'm not saying it's all true. But again explain building 7. I know this seems old to rehash now, but in light of everything else happening I think it's VERY pertient.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext