SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (502351)8/7/2009 10:14:27 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation   of 1576160
 
CJ is WRONG (again) about highway fatality rate being lower than that of cities.

The highway fatality rate is much lower than that of driving on city streets. IIRC, most fatal accidents occur within 10 miles of where the victim lives.


While most accidents do happen within 10 miles of home (this is a chestnut you obviously just pulled off the head and foolishly applied to fatalities - most accidents don't result in fatalities), highway driving IS more likely to produce fatalities.

"..states with a largely rural character and a high percentage of two lane roads will have greater fatalities ..."
books.google.com

BTW, WY has by far the highest traffic fatality rate per 100,000 population - rural, two lane highways, long distances to go anywhere. MS, SC, MT, NM, AR, SD follow. Lowest traffic fatality rates MA, RI, NY, NJ, CT - small urbanized states.

Also see this with 1996 data:
publicpurpose.com
Rural fatalities are the green bars and you can see they're higher than the yellow bars (urban fatalities).

Once more, we see CJ pulling foolish ideas out of his head and foolishly passing them off as facts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext