2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 383.15

+0.8%

Nov 26 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Gib Bogle who wrote (53432)	8/11/2009 12:11:29 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 218043

Pleased to oblige. But did you appreciate this one? I had hoped for a bite: < Your stereotype has been dinged. You are the one with contradictions and stereotypes; you socialists are all like that, dealing in stereotypes. > Helen Clark should have killed quite a few lymphoma patients in NZ with the medical cartel restrictions on use of Rituxan. Acts of omission are as death-dealing as outright attacks. There would be few who would know they didn't need to die [none since they died, but their relatives probably didn't notice either]. There is significant Pierian Spring drinking needed to notice. It's silly that Helengrad forces everyone wear crash helmets on bicycles but won't let them buy kidneys to stay alive or buy Rituxan to stay alive. It is illegal to withhold the necessaries of life [for parents] but the medical cartel and government can get away with it - but perhaps not if tested in court. It's not that they should provide those necessaries of life, just get out of the way and don't make it illegal for people to be alive. With-holding permission to be alive is criminal. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next