SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Claude Cormier who wrote (100770)8/13/2009 1:09:54 AM
From: Elroy Jetson  Read Replies (1) of 116555
 
What you're saying is, if someone owes you $10,000 and they die leaving you only $6,000 in their estate, your money supply is still $10,000 because they still haven't repaid you the missing $4,000.

According to your math there's still the $4,000 out there that was spent AND the $4,000 owed to you by a dead person you'll never collect. So there is no $4,000 reduction in the money supply, only a $4,000 increase in the money supply when you first lent them the money - according to you.

You can believe this if you wish, but it's not mathematically correct, nor does it make any sense. When your money is gone, it's gone, even though no one paid you back.
.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext