SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : YellowLegalPad

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John McCarthy who wrote (744)8/17/2009 11:18:13 AM
From: John McCarthy   of 1182
 
Summary of Second Quarter 2009 Negative Equity Data from First American CoreLogic
August 13, 2009

loanperformance.com

NEW DATA SHOWS NEARLY ONE-THIRD OF ALL MORTGAGES UNDERWATER
More than $3 Trillion Worth of Property at Risk of Default

Negative equity, often referred to as “underwater” or “upside down,” means the borrower owes more on their
mortgage than the home is worth. Near negative equity is when mortgages are within five percent of being in a
negative equity position. Negative equity can occur because of a decline in value, an increase in mortgage debt
or a combination of both.

• The distribution of negative equity is heavily skewed to a small number of states as three states account for
roughly half of all mortgage borrowers in a negative equity position. Nevada (66 percent) had the highest
percentage with nearly two-thirds of mortgage borrowers in a negative equity position. In Arizona (51 percent)
and Florida (49 percent), half of all mortgage borrowers were in a negative equity position. Michigan (48
percent) and California (42 percent) round out the top five states.

The top five states’ negative equity share was 47 percent, compared to 25 percent for the remaining states. In
numerical terms, California (2.9 million) and Florida (2.3 million) had the largest number of negative equity
mortgages, accounting for 5.2 million or 35 percent of all negative equity loans. Ohio (862,000), Texas (777,000)
and Arizona (706,000) were also ranked among the top five states with the highest number of negative equity
loans.

“Negative equity continues to be the dominant driver of the mortgage market because it leads to foreclosures in the
event a borrower experiences some kind of economic shock such as a job loss, illness or other adverse situation. Given
that negative equity did not increase this quarter and home prices declines are moderating or flattening, we may be at
the peak of the negative equity cycle. However, until negative equity recedes and unemployment declines, mortgage
risk will continue to be very elevated,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for First American CoreLogic.

Methodology*:
First American CoreLogic has created state- and CBSA-level negative equity estimates for all single-family residential properties in the U.S. The data
includes 47 million properties with a mortgage, which accounts for over 90 percent of all mortgages in the U.S.*. The data was revised for 2009
and the revisions included a large addition of junior liens (including multiple junior liens), additional residential property types that were previously
excluded and a broader range of home values. The net impact of the revisions was a large increase in negative equity.
First American CoreLogic used its public record data as the source of the mortgage debt outstanding (MDO) and it includes 1st mortgage liens and
junior mortgage liens in order to capture the true level of mortgage debt outstanding for each property. The current value was estimated by using
the First American CoreLogic Automated Valuation Models (AVM) for every residential property in the U.S. The data was filtered to include only
properties valued between $30,000 and $30 million because AVM accuracy tends to quickly worsen outside of that value range.
The amount of equity for each property was determined by subtracting the property’s estimated current value from the mortgage debt
outstanding. If the mortgage debt was greater than the estimated value, then the property is in a negative equity position. The data was created at
the zip code level and aggregated to the state, CBSA and U.S. totals.

*Note: Only data for mortgaged residential properties that have an AVM value is presented. There are several states where the public record, AVM
or mortgage coverage is very thin. Although coverage is thin, these states account for fewer than five percent of the total population of the U.S.

The mortgage debt outstanding was not adjusted for amortization, however the majority of mortgages were originated within the last six years
where the difference between the original mortgage debt outstanding and current mortgage debt outstanding is not large

loanperformance.com

CRACKER
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext