SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: John Koligman who wrote (8317)8/17/2009 4:31:44 PM
From: Lane32 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) of 42652
 
shouldn’t we instantly cut some of the money spent on exorbitant intensive-care medicine for dying, elderly people and redirect it to pediatricians and obstetricians offering preventive care for children and mothers?

While I agree with the author, pretty much, on the wasteful end-of-life spending, I utterly disagree with where he's coming from. His framework is redistributionist. "We" should be giving our money to kids rather than to the elderly," sez he. It's scary when "we" think "we" or some bureaucrat who is our proxy should redistribute resources amongst citizens.

I’m just wondering why the nation continues incurring enormous debt to pay for bypass surgery and titanium-knee replacements for octogenarians and nonagenarians

I have a couple of ninety-something aunts who got knee replacements in their eighties. They're pretty frisky. One is still working (to support her shiftless daughter and grandson). Seems to me that those knee replacements were worthwhile. Now, if they were bedridden, not so much.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext