I find it even more amazing that these self-styled "cyber sleupps" are so hypocritical that they condone activities of their associates while being upset when they are subject to the same sort of targeting.
For example, you know RB poster Carmelbeach, who reads every post over here and claims not to be a member or at least does not disclose (what may be multiple alias use,) but spends the time scouring the cite. He cited your post from here on RB Banman's to somehow claim that you were giving investment advice and then cited a list of my posts on RB as somehow showing that I post a lot.
What he failed to mention, was that on common boards, Carmelbeach dwarfs your posts and my posts. He is close to a 24/7 full time gossiping "cut and paster."
He also failed to comment that most of my cited posts on RB where to point out cowardly threats, personal attacks, defamation, vulgarity and racial/ethnic slurs by a poster who has been stalking me and others. The hypocrite Carmelbeach recently posted that he hits the TOU button when there are violations, and there is nothing wrong with that. However, he apparently does not do this when the targets are those with whom he disagrees. He seems very protective of violations that originate from those with whom he agrees.
Although I disagree with you a bit and have no problem really with legitimate bashing, it's the hypocrisy of those such as Carmelbeach that look one way when it serves their purpose, and then looks away when they can really do some good. The high horse they ride is quite unbalanced. |
