SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (8640)8/24/2009 12:12:24 PM
From: Lane32 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 42652
 
I explained that he was supporting 'central planing' against states rights.

Except that he wasn't.

6. Yes there would be some tort reform.

Forgot to put it in my most recent list. Should have.

8. Individuals would be required to get some minimum type of policy (??? Devil in the details).

IMO, the devil is in the concept, not the details.

I can see requiring insurance if you are building a socialized system, which can't tolerate free riders. With a free market "REAL" or otherwise, I don't see the point. They would not be free riders. They wouldn't ride at all. What rationale do you have to offer for that requirement?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext