Carmelbeach, you have mentioned me in your posts so I will respond solely for clarification. I'm not sure if you object, but you are correct that I have complained about your posts for the following reasons.
1. You gossip.
2. The endless repetition and style reads like a telephone book. Any informative message is often lost in the "boring" style of the post.
I'm not entirely sure, but you seem to indicate that I incorrectly term your posts as above because your posts also have elements of truth, albeit repeated to the level of spam often.
Again, I have no problem with sleuthing, with exposure of scams, and have repeatedly posted that pinks should only be traded with gambling money, have worked to change the system to require more disclosure of trading, flow of information, transparency of money pools, of management dilution and dumping, of market making, etc. I often commend sleuths such as the Truthseeker, from whom I have learned much and adapted my own trading style successfully.
My own attacking of those who would defend the status quo with respect to market making, hedge funds, money pools, and those who associate with them have made me a target of those who claim that "their scam is ok and should be ignored" for their professed interpretation of the "greater good," largely penny stock scam exposure. I have repeatedly posted that the issues about which I post have almost nothing to do with pinkies and have been misquoted and had my posts taken out of context by self-styled "cyber sleupps."
So, to the extent that your posts deal with LBWR, the company, I have no objection and I don't disagree with any factual content or even the negative opinions of the company. To your credit, you haven't said that I do. You merely are upset that I have called you on your tendency to add gossip and to spam. To that extent, you don't seem to be disagreeing with my assertion that you do this (although it's not clear admittedly whether you are upset or not.) So, thank you.
I also commend you to the extent you add anything original about the company itself. I can't recall anything at this point, but I'm sure somewhere in all that blather is stuff that is negative and of good use to potential investors, and which is actually original and material to the company and investment in the company. This stock should be avoided by anyone other than someone who can trade quickly and who understands that it is an extreme gamble. I would say this about just about every pinkie, with the possible exception of some of the higher end listings, of which this is not one.
Irrespective of that, what makes you, alydyr, whistles and the anniebonnies of the world, self-styled "cyber sleupps" is the fact that you need to include the gossip, the spam, the boring nature, the hiding on obscure blogs and boards, claiming to be on a high horse, failing to TOS posts unless you disagree with them. Anniebonnie has been criticized, excellently if I may add, for using "6 degrees of separation" posts to make points, really posting without thinking, this criticism being by someone with whom she apparently agrees. Alydyr has been booted repeated for lying and attacking and now must hide in obscurity, beating off his own chest for imaginary self-credit and . Good luck to someone like that LOL!! More name calling and more lies will be his retort.
Of course, you know all that, as you, and your fellow "sleupps" read all my posts, and comment on so many, so
let the "sleupping" continue. Hang on sleuppy, hang on! |
