Evolution Message Board - Msg: 25906301

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Brumar89 who wrote (2861)	8/31/2009 4:58:31 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (2) of 69300

<If you're going to pursue a career in the biological sciences, you should probably be very careful where you say things like that.> LOL... As I've said donzens of times in the past several hundered posts there are "neo-Lamarckians" and "Evo-Devo" types crawling all over biology departments all the over the world. Further most every evolutionary biologist is aware of the problems with "random mutation", whether they agree or not. I have conversations all the time with Graduate level professors about this stuff... it's NOT a big deal. Believe me, if Behe wasn't raising eyebrows with his claim of refuting "Darwinism"- ie. if he would stick to 'random mutation', and properly pick out specific (random mutation) mechansims, no one would even pay attention to him. All sorts of people have the same ideas but they don't claim "Darwinsism" is the problem. Better be ready for science to fully embrace the idea the the organism is involved in it's own evolution (pretty obvious really) and random mutation to fall by the wayside... AND SCIENTIST WILL BE THE ONES (are) showing the way AND "evolution" will simply morph from it's present form... no one is going to throw the idea away. DAK

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next