Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (27057)	9/3/2009 5:43:51 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) of 28931

>> Scientific consensus has been wrong repeatedly in the past and continues to ne wrong today with Darwinian Evolution and Global Warming. As for testability and repeatability you are just wrong. What can be observed are small and relatively insignificant mutations within species. What the "researchers" are doing is wildly extrapolating their results and applying conjecture to come up with the results they want. That is when they are not using outright fraud to get big money grants and prestigious appointments.>> They are not "wildely extrapolating" the facts. They built an atomic bomb and went men to the moon based on Einsteins theory of relativity and quantum physics. National Geographic even shows how mankind came out of Africa based on DNA testing. They show the paths. Google it! YOu just sort of say things and mix up ideas. Like I said, you are using your religious emotion and then just saying the first thing that comes to mind to defend your position. Scientist do not extrapolate wildly. In fact it is just the opposit they are like scared little rabbits to say anything because they know the entire scientifc population of the world will be evaluating their worth as a scientist by what research they report. I did the statistics on the miller Freemon research vessel many years ago in the Bearing sea. They were doing crab migrations and found what they thought was a hybrid between an opillio and Bardi tanner crab. It was clear to me it was a hybrid (the shape of the mouth) as the only social scientist, but not one hard scientst was willing to declare anything beyond it as a possibility. My son in la is a world recognized scientist and jsut gave a papper Vienna on how formaldahyde forms in the atmosphere. he is a serious as a heart attack and you can be sure he was absolutely everything bit of his new theory was tested, retested and retested again. The world was going to evaluate his work. Wildly extrapolating. See you do not understand the scientific community at all.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next