Welcome to Slider's Dugout Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Welcome to Slider's Dugout

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Northern Marlin who wrote (19102)	9/3/2009 8:33:52 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) of 50391

I was hoping you might of read some of the links provided. How about a skeptics view? In conclusion, through his Global Warming Petition Project, Arthur Robinson has solicited the opinions of the wrong group of people in the wrong way and drawn the wrong conclusions about any possible consensus among relevant and qualified scientists regarding the hypothesis of human-caused global warming. His petition is unqualified to deliver answers about a consensus in which the public is interested. He has a right to conduct any kind of petition drive he wishes, but he is not ethically entitled to misrepresent his petition as a fair reflection of relevant scientific opinion. He has confused his political with his scientific aims and misled the public in the process. skeptic.com I left out all the news paper links where reporters found very obvious fakes in the petition. I really didn't think it was necessary to point those items out. OISM and it's petition is so full of holes it's impossible to count them all.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next