SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Box-By-The-Riviera™ who wrote (393898)9/6/2009 1:25:32 PM
From: prosperous  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
You will see ~12% and ~22% performance difference between 2.26 vs 2.66 and 2.26 vs 2.93GHz MAC for single threaded applications (mostly client applications that tend to be cache bound and are more latency sensitive than throughput sensitive). The difference will be correspondingly smaller for multi-threaded applications since the power envelope limits the freq depending on application. Have heard good things about flash drives; jury out on their reliability (they use some wear-leveling algorithms to even out usage since the flash cells have limited write cycles).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News