SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mary Cluney who wrote (9200)9/8/2009 11:10:01 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 42652
 
however govenment has a role to ensure that everyone has equal access to healthcare

Not sure what you mean by "access", but why should it be equal? Is this something along the lines of 1 person = 1 vote? I never heard anything about "everyone must get an equal share of the health care".

The reality is that some people can afford gold plated health care and others -- those without resources -- need to accept a different level of care.

When you talk about "equal care", you are talking about something that simply cannot be delivered. I know of Medicaid nursing homes packed with patients who have no assets. Is it reasonable to expect the same level care at these places that you would get from a $60,000/year facility? Of course not. These patients simply have to settle for less. That doesn't mean they can't get a "reasonable" standard of care, but it isn't going to be as good as others can afford, and by a wide margin.

The country needs to get past the idea that health care is a "right". It isn't. And as soon as you make it a "right", you have to provide those $60,000/year nursing homes for Medicaid patients, and then you'll REALLY see a broke government.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext