SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A US National Health Care System?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (9257)9/10/2009 2:54:59 PM
From: Mary Cluney  Read Replies (2) of 42652
 
<<<The question on the table is how the person dying "from old age" saves health care dollars over the the person who dies early. >>>

I am making the case that in both cases the person dies. So the costs are even. But the person who lives carelessly and is besieged with health problems caused by bad behavior incurs greater expenses over a life time.

Look at it another way, you have two people born at the same time and dies at the same time. Only one lives a dangerous life style and gets into fights and is shot 4 or 5 times in his lifetime. The other one lives a quiet life. Which one will incur greater medical expenses over a lifetime?

Now substitue a violent life style with one that is based on poor eating habits. The one with the poor eating habits will incur all kinds of disease from overeating but medical treatment will keep him from an early death.

The person with a bad life style will incur greater medical expenses.

A person with a bad lifestyle will (most likely) incur expenses that would otherwise not be needed.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext