The whole POINT of "Science" (as in Science magazine) "Scientific American", vs the usage of the word "science" in every day use (let's say my 13 year old) was in the larger context of the differences between the periodicals, and your ignorance about that fact. The "rest of the media" (probably another black helicopter cabal, most likely in cahoots with "Scinece" I'm sure) uses the term science in a miriad of ways... THATS THE WHOLE POINT. I never condoned or judged or even commented on it. "Media" mmisuses scientific info all the time. That's actually THE POINT of scientific journals... Get over it.
The only time you seem to care about the meaning of the word science is when I criticize someone.
You're only liberal compared to a rightwingnutcreationist like me? You know, liberals pretty much all say that. Just like they resort to name-calling and insults.
I have no idea what the comments below are in reference too. You use the word context, but don't apply it.
{note 1: the greater quote marks do to your pathological habit of taking things out of context}
{note 2: As a staunch opponent of big government:
Of the best leaders, The people only know that they exist; the next best they love and praise, the next they fear; and the next they revile. But of the best leaders: when their task is accomplished, their work done, the people all remark, ''We have done it ourselves.''
Sadly since the WACKONUTCASES have hijacked the "big tent party", burned the tent, and dug a bunker... there is little choice left fo those with common sense. |
