hello rose, i feel it is my duty to point out the seemingly obvious, at least to me, that
(i) there is little difference between the debt wastrel republicans and the fiscal bankrupt democrats, for they both are morally kaput
(ii) the discussion can only be one of degree, whether the democrats are more competent at fraud or the republicans are more expert at evil
(iii) whereas it was obvious to many, and later just about all, that bush was a moron, and an ineffective one at that
(iv) it is still not at all obviously clear to most that obama is a fascist communist war-mongering forked-tongue spendthrift and tele-prompted talker of the more dangerous popularity-seeking sort, and will prove to be more damaging than bush could ever have been (given the power balance w/i the current structure)
is it not the duty of those of us to shout "fire" when we, with all conviction, sense evidence of such?
whereas bush progressed much on destroying nations,
obama should prove guilty in pulverizing the middle class, without which a destroyed nation cannot be rebuilt
to preclude oneself from considering the true possibilities as amply indicated by the trillions of facts and preponderance of of signals is to do oneself a disservice and one's family terrible harm and one's friends a no-good
i have sensed nothing about obama that should cause me to change my view of him, and should i sense different, most happy, relievedly so, to retract
in the mean time, i will watch and brief per my premise, as it continues to track true, gold be my witness |
