A US National Health Care System? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lane3 who wrote (9373)	9/13/2009 9:51:58 AM
From: gg cox	Read Replies (2) of 42652

<<How much would it be if you were self employed or retired at age 50 or between jobs?>> Of course i am referring to individual underwriting as above... I am not referring to a group plan...How could i be referring to a group plan when i said "self employed" or" between jobs.." You said <<It wouldn't cost anything. This is a group plan. The folks you mentioned aren't part of the group so they aren't eligible.>> Exactly, not eligible in your group, what would they be paying at age 50 ? under individual underwriting age 64?? I would say that the increase would be substantial and much more than at age 50 And you said Age is not a factor. here Message 25937638 Age is a factor and don't fudge the facts. Look at the legacy costs of GM.<maybe GM could move all of their retired workers to your plan and ...your words here quote ""For the record, the employee's monthly share of the premium on my insurance is $152.06 for singles and $356.59 for families. The only difference in premiums is single/family.Age is not a factor"" If your plan was to accept all of the aging GM workers into your plan, your premiums would sky rocket. Age is a factor.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next